Impermanent Loss (Detailed)
Definition
The difference between holding tokens in a liquidity pool versus simply holding them in your wallet, caused by price divergence between the paired tokens in an automated market maker.
Impermanent loss is the cost of providing liquidity to an automated market maker (AMM). When you deposit two tokens into a liquidity pool, the AMM rebalances your position as prices change. If one token's price increases significantly relative to the other, you end up with more of the cheaper token and less of the expensive one — less total value than simply holding.
A concrete example: you deposit $5,000 of ETH and $5,000 of USDC into a liquidity pool ($10,000 total). If ETH doubles in price, a simple hold would be worth $15,000 ($10,000 ETH + $5,000 USDC). But the pool automatically rebalances, leaving you with approximately $14,142. The $858 difference is the impermanent loss — about 5.7%.
The loss is called "impermanent" because it reverses if prices return to their original ratio. If ETH drops back to its original price, the loss disappears. However, if you withdraw while prices are divergent, the loss becomes permanent. In practice, many liquidity providers withdraw during divergence, making the "impermanent" label misleading.
Impermanent loss increases with price divergence. A 25% price change causes ~0.6% loss. A 2x price change causes ~5.7% loss. A 5x change causes ~25.5% loss. Pools with highly correlated assets (USDC/USDT) have minimal impermanent loss. Pools with volatile pairings (ETH/SHIB) have extreme exposure.
To be profitable as a liquidity provider, trading fees earned must exceed impermanent loss. High-volume pools on popular pairs can generate 20-50%+ APR in fees, potentially outweighing the impermanent loss. Low-volume pools may not generate enough fees to compensate, resulting in a net loss compared to simply holding the tokens.
Where this appears in Clarity
Clarity automatically tracks and calculates these concepts across your connected accounts.
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I avoid impermanent loss?
You can minimize it by providing liquidity to pools with correlated assets (stablecoin pairs have near-zero IL). Concentrated liquidity positions (Uniswap V3) let you set price ranges but increase IL risk if prices move outside your range. You can't eliminate IL entirely in volatile pools — it's the fundamental cost of providing liquidity.
When is providing liquidity still profitable despite IL?
When trading fees exceed impermanent loss. High-volume pools (major token pairs) on popular DEXs generate the most fees. Some protocols offer additional incentives (token rewards) on top of fees. Calculate the total yield (fees + rewards) and compare to the IL for your price divergence scenario.
