Evidence
Every claim on the comparison page is listed here with the source set used to support or background-check it.
This page inventories the current comparison-page claims and links the official pages, help-center articles, pricing pages, and policy documents used during verification.
Claims about Clarity product behavior are first-party claims. Competitor claims rely on their public materials and are reviewed against those materials as part of the compare-page maintenance process.
This version links the live background sources used during verification. Archived screenshots are not bundled into the repo yet, so the citations page currently focuses on claim inventory plus source links.
Summary
Nansen is stronger for onchain analytics and smart-money tracking.
Background links
Summary
Clarity is better when you want crypto in the same system as banks, brokerages, and the rest of your money.
Background links
Choose Clarity if
One dashboard across traditional accounts, exchanges, wallets, and total net worth.
Background links
Choose Clarity if
Hybrid investors with both traditional and crypto assets
Background links
Choose Clarity if
Privacy-conscious users who want full data deletion
Background links
Choose Clarity if
Users who need a single net worth view across all accounts
Background links
Choose Clarity if
Crypto holders who need cost basis tracking for taxes
Background links
Choose Nansen Portfolio if
Crypto-native users who care about wallet tracking plus smart-money analytics and token flows.
Background links
Choose Nansen Portfolio if
Crypto traders who want onchain analytics beside wallet tracking
Background links
Choose Nansen Portfolio if
Users who follow smart-money and token-flow signals
Background links
Choose Nansen Portfolio if
Investors focused on multichain crypto activity rather than household finance
Background links
Rubric: coverage
Clarity covers banks, brokerages, exchanges, and onchain wallets in one product.
Background links
Rubric: coverage
Nansen Portfolio covers multichain wallets and onchain activity well, but it does not aggregate traditional finance accounts.
Background links
Rubric: reliability
Clarity uses retries and health checks across financial and crypto connectors.
Background links
Rubric: reliability
Nansen is built around onchain portfolio and analytics workloads, making wallet-level data a core part of the product.
Background links
Rubric: pricingPredictability
Flat Clarity subscription with all core features included.
Background links
Rubric: pricingPredictability
Nansen has a free entry point, but its main differentiated analytics are paid and priced for active crypto users.
Background links
Rubric: dataFreshness
Strong crypto freshness plus a broader net-worth view across account types.
Background links
Rubric: dataFreshness
Nansen is optimized for live onchain visibility and token-flow analysis.
Background links
Rubric: historicalDepth
Clarity maintains account history and snapshots across supported sources.
Background links
Rubric: historicalDepth
Nansen is built for users who inspect token, wallet, and historical onchain activity over time.
Background links
Rubric: exportReporting
Exports and reporting span both traditional and crypto data.
Background links
Rubric: exportReporting
Nansen is stronger for analysis than for mixed-asset reporting and exports across your whole financial life.
Background links
Rubric: privacySecurity
Read-only connections, no ad tech, and full account deletion support a stronger broad-finance privacy model.
Background links
Rubric: privacySecurity
Nansen is wallet-first and analytics-driven, avoiding bank-credential risk but staying crypto-only.
Background links
Rubric: developerExperience
No public Clarity API today.
Background links
Rubric: developerExperience
Nansen offers API and analytics-oriented surfaces for power users and teams.
Background links
Deep dive: coverage
Clarity connects bank accounts, brokerages, crypto exchanges, and on-chain wallets into one net-worth number. That means your checking balance, 401(k) performance, Coinbase holdings, and DeFi positions share a single dashboard — something Nansen does not attempt.
Background links
Deep dive: coverage
Nansen is more specialized. It is designed for onchain users who want wallet intelligence, token flows, and smart-money context along with portfolio tracking.
Background links
Deep dive: coverage
Choose Nansen for onchain research. Choose Clarity for total financial visibility.
Background links
Deep dive: dataFreshness
Clarity syncs crypto prices near real-time and refreshes bank and brokerage balances multiple times per day with on-demand manual refresh available anytime. That cadence is built for daily net-worth tracking across every account type, not just wallets.
Background links
Deep dive: dataFreshness
Nansen is closer to an onchain intelligence terminal. Its freshness advantage matters most if you actively monitor wallet movements and token flows.
Background links
Deep dive: dataFreshness
Nansen is stronger for live onchain analysis. Clarity is stronger when you need crypto balances next to bank accounts, brokerage performance, and total net worth.
Background links
Deep dive: pricingPredictability
Clarity is $99/year for banks, brokerages, crypto, spending analysis, and AI — no usage tiers and no per-wallet fees. You pay the same whether you track two accounts or twenty.
Background links
Deep dive: pricingPredictability
Nansen's premium tiers make sense for serious crypto users, but can feel expensive if you only want a tracker and not a research surface.
Background links
Deep dive: pricingPredictability
Clarity is simpler. Nansen is worth it only if you actually need the analytics layer.
Background links
Deep dive: reliability
Clarity uses retries and health checks across both financial aggregator and crypto connectors, covering banks, brokerages, exchanges, and wallets in one reliability model.
Background links
Deep dive: reliability
Nansen is purpose-built around onchain data and analytics workloads, so wallet-level reliability is a core strength. It does not need to handle traditional finance connection variability.
Background links
Deep dive: reliability
Both score well on reliability. The difference is scope: Clarity must stay reliable across a wider surface area of connection types.
Background links
Deep dive: historicalDepth
Clarity maintains account history and snapshots across all supported sources, including banks, brokerages, and crypto. History goes back up to two years via Plaid, with ongoing snapshots stored indefinitely.
Background links
Deep dive: historicalDepth
Nansen is built for users who inspect token movements, wallet activity, and historical onchain flows over time. Its historical depth is strongest in the crypto-native domain.
Background links
Deep dive: historicalDepth
Nansen has deeper crypto history. Clarity has broader history across more account types.
Background links
Deep dive: exportReporting
Clarity offers CSV exports and reporting that span both traditional accounts and crypto holdings, making it useful for taxes, accounting, and personal analysis across your full financial picture.
Background links
Deep dive: exportReporting
Nansen is optimized for analysis dashboards and onchain intelligence rather than mixed-asset reporting and data export across your whole financial life.
Background links
Deep dive: exportReporting
Clarity is better for exporting and reporting across asset classes. Nansen is better for onchain analysis surfaces.
Background links
Deep dive: privacySecurity
Clarity uses read-only connections, has no ad tech or data sales, and supports full account deletion. The broader scope of traditional and crypto accounts is handled under one privacy model.
Background links
Deep dive: privacySecurity
Nansen is wallet-first and analytics-driven, so it avoids bank-credential risk entirely. Its privacy model is simpler because it only handles public blockchain data and user-linked wallets.
Background links
Deep dive: privacySecurity
Both take privacy seriously. Nansen sidesteps bank-credential risk by staying crypto-only. Clarity manages a wider trust surface but offers stronger data-ownership controls.
Background links
FAQ: Is Nansen better than Clarity for crypto research?
Yes. Nansen is better if your goal is smart-money analysis and onchain intelligence. Clarity is better if you want crypto connected to the rest of your finances.
Background links
FAQ: Does Nansen track banks and brokerages?
No. Nansen is a crypto-native analytics and portfolio product, not a full personal finance aggregator.
Background links
FAQ: Which is better for net worth?
Clarity is better for full net worth. Nansen is better for the crypto slice of your portfolio.
Background links
FAQ: Do I need both?
Some active crypto users may. Nansen can be the research layer while Clarity becomes the total-money dashboard.
Background links
Trust and legal notes
Nansen disclosed that a third-party vendor breach in September 2023 affected some user email addresses and exposed some blockchain-address information. I found this through secondary reporting rather than a still-live official incident page.
Background links
Trust and legal notes
Nansen's privacy policy says some labels may reveal the identities of natural persons from public blockchain activity, and its Points program collects subscription, staking, referral, and participation data.
Background links
Trust and legal notes
Nansen's terms require Singapore SIAC arbitration, say there are no refunds on termination, allow access restrictions for legal or security reasons, and cap liability to fees paid in the prior 12 months.
Background links